Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 432,090
Bonilla
as 4:2025cv03956
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins (PS) v. Turner et al
as 1:2025cv01450
Petitioner:
Willis Earl Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Turner and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaufman (PS) v. Chief Pretrial Services Officer, Larimer County et al
as 1:2025cv01452
Petitioner:
Karie Kristeen Kaufman
Respondent:
Chief Pretrial Services Officer, Larimer County and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DILLON v. SAULSBERRY
as 3:2025cv00601
Petitioner:
OSCAR DILLON, III
Respondent:
S SAULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BISHOP v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2025cv00190
Petitioner:
ELIGIO BISHOP
Respondent:
WARDEN MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mincey v. USA
as 1:2025cv00628
Petitioner:
Bobby Joe Mincey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Higley-Zuehlke v. Howard
as 2:2025cv11354
Petitioner:
Judy Higley-Zuehlke
Respondent:
Warden Jeremy Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Swider #695973 v. Macauley
as 1:2025cv00531
Petitioner:
Thomas Swider #695973
Respondent:
Matt Macauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenoir v. McClure
as 1:2025cv00069
Petitioner:
Ray Charles Lenoir
Respondent:
Marc McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sadleir v. Lott
as 5:2025hc02107
Petitioner:
William Sadleir
Respondent:
Acting Warden B. Lott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
