District Court Cases in Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 815,878
DEMPSEY v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00592
Plaintiff:
JULIE M DEMPSEY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, PHARMACIA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FRYE v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00594
Plaintiff:
MARY FRYE
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, GREENSTONE LLC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORTSON v. SHERIFF ERIC ADEN et al
as 3:2025cv00591
Plaintiff:
CHANTIMEKKI FORTSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF ERIC ADEN, DEPUTY EDDIE DURAN, CHEZ ELAN PROPERTY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
MERRILL v. LEWIS et al
as 3:2025cv00588
Plaintiff:
BRIAN T MERRILL
Defendant:
B LEWIS and Z MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 3:2025cv00590
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP S WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
P RODRIGUEZ, C RICKS, A JOHNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Bartolucci et al
as 0:2025cv60890
Defendant:
Raffaele Bartolucci and Anna Goldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Acropolis Marble & Granite, Corp.
as 0:2025cv60889
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
ACROPOLIS MARBLE & GRANITE, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
