Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,983
Jones v. Vaught
as 0:2025cv02028
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ron Jones
Respondent:
T. Vaught
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kennedy v. Warden, FPC Duluth
as 0:2025cv02008
Petitioner:
Jamar Antron Kennedy
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Duluth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murphy v. Eischen et al
as 0:2025cv01984
Petitioner:
Michael S. Murphy
Respondent:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maestas v. Eischen et al
as 0:2025cv01985
Petitioner:
Elesaio Ben Guzm Maestas
Respondent:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunt v. Eischen et al
as 0:2025cv01986
Petitioner:
Christopher Hunt
Respondent:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calles Corrales v. Eischen et al
as 0:2025cv01987
Petitioner:
Esvin Ivan Calles Corrales
Respondent:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kroger v. Bondi
as 0:2025cv01988
Petitioner:
James Anthony Kroger
Respondent:
Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trifiletti v. Bolin
as 0:2025cv01989
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Trifiletti
Defendant:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
As-Sidiq v. Hurlock et al
as 0:2025cv01971
Petitioner:
La'Quedrick As-Sidiq
Respondent:
Caitlyn Hurlock, Brian Meiton and Mark Empting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Stenseth
as 0:2025cv01746
Petitioner:
Carl Stanley Williams
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
