Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,521
Rosario v. Quiros
as 3:2025cv00744
Petitioner:
Ernest Rosario
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lockett v. Flowers
as 3:2025cv00653
Petitioner:
Brian Lockett
Respondent:
Caryn Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patton v. Flowers
as 3:2025cv00635
Petitioner:
Omari Patton
Respondent:
Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Felix v. Warden, FCI Danbury
as 3:2025cv00605
Petitioner:
Daniel Felix
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Antar v. Lodice et al
as 3:2025cv00582
Petitioner:
Theodora Antar
Respondent:
Matthew John Lodice, Gerald Viglione, Jr., State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Calderon v. Flowers
as 3:2025cv00549
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Calderon
Respondent:
Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Clifford et al
as 3:2025cv00542
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Thomas
Respondent:
Patrick Clifford, Jennifer Lindade, William Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mercado v. Flowers
as 3:2025cv00508
Petitioner:
Herman Mercado
Respondent:
Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schnekenburger v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00501
Petitioner:
John Schnekenburger
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Claude v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00383
Petitioner:
Evens Claude
Respondent:
FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
