Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 96,738
Bonilla
as 4:2025cv03956
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Guzman et al
as 3:2025cv03981
Petitioner:
Jameson Wolfgang Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Fidencio N. Guzman and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miner v. Bondi et al
as 2:2025cv01540
Petitioner:
Ronald L Miner
Respondent:
Pamela Bondi, Jason Gunther and FCI Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rincon-Corrales v. Noem et al
as 2:2025cv00801
Petitioner:
Alexis Rincon-Corrales
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, US Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Michael Bernacke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tache Gabriel Georgescu v. Birkholz
as 2:2025cv04176
Petitioner:
Tache Gabriel Georgescu
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Doran v. Rumsey
as 2:2025cv00749
Petitioner:
Edward Glen Doran II
Respondent:
Rumsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letherman v. Rosa et al
as 1:2025cv00062
Petitioner:
Mikel Stetson Letherman
Respondent:
L. Rosa and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Cahill v. Doerer
as 1:2025cv00538
Petitioner:
Christopher Ryan Cahill
Respondent:
Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
David Anthony Dean v. St. Andres
as 5:2025cv01088
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
St. Andres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. State of Oregon
as 6:2025cv00743
Petitioner:
Alex Verlyn Lyle Rice
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
