California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56,849
(HC)Sullivan v. Horn
as 2:2025cv01324
Petitioner:
Dwayne Sullivan
Respondent:
Pat Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla
as 4:2025cv03956
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Williams v. Warden, FCI Mendota
as 1:2025cv00546
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Guzman et al
as 3:2025cv03981
Petitioner:
Jameson Wolfgang Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Fidencio N. Guzman and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tache Gabriel Georgescu v. Birkholz
as 2:2025cv04176
Petitioner:
Tache Gabriel Georgescu
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC)Cahill v. Doerer
as 1:2025cv00538
Petitioner:
Christopher Ryan Cahill
Respondent:
Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
David Anthony Dean v. St. Andres
as 5:2025cv01088
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
St. Andres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ludwig v. Hill
as 3:2025cv01151
Petitioner:
Kenneth James Ludwig
Respondent:
James H. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iagounov v. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
as 2:2025cv01288
Petitioner:
Anton Iagounov
Respondent:
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Sandoval-Pasos v. Taylor
as 1:2025cv00525
Petitioner:
Juan Sandoval-Pasos
Respondent:
T. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
