District Court Cases in Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 61,459
USA v. SCRB Properties, Inc.
as 6:2025cv00085
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
SCRB Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Cashmer v. SSA
as 7:2025cv00024
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Cashmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2025cv00163
Plaintiff:
Mozetta White
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Winona Powder Coating, Inc. v. TrinSoft, LLC
as 5:2025cv00162
Plaintiff:
Winona Powder Coating, Inc.
Defendant:
TrinSoft, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gardner v. Porter et al
as 5:2025cv00161
Petitioner:
Troy Gardner
Respondent:
David Porter and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. SSA
as 5:2025cv00164
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Perkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
In Re Attorney Admission for Patrick Nicholas Grote
as 5:2025aa00043
Unknown:
Attorney Admission Application
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. HMPL21-0257 v. Blue Management Services, LLC
as 3:2025cv00264
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. HMPL21-0257
Defendant:
Blue Management Services, LLC doing business as Alliant Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hillard v. Darnell
as 1:2025cv00063
Plaintiff:
Susan Hillard
Defendant:
Ashton B. Darnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
