Gardner v. Porter et al
Troy Gardner |
David Porter and Department of Corrections |
5:2025cv00161 |
May 7, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Matthew A Stinnett |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KCF) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Troy Gardner, pro se. Motions referred to Matthew A. Stinnett. (KCF) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Troy Gardner, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Order, #2 Attachment Receipt, #3 Envelope no PM)(KCF) |
Conflict Check run. (KCF) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Troy Gardner (KCF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.