Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Texoma Woodworks, LLC v. De Jesus et al
as 4:2025cv00460
Plaintiff:
Texoma Woodworks, LLC
Defendant:
Carlos De Jesus, Leo's Trucking TX, LLC and ATS Logistics Services, Inc. doing business as Sureway Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Texoma Woodworks LLC v. De Jesus et al
as 3:2025cv00790
Plaintiff:
Texoma Woodworks, LLC
Defendant:
Carlos De Jesus, Leo's Trucking TX LLC and ATS Logistics Services, Inc. dba Sureway Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DE JESUS v. ADT LLC
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DE JESUS
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
US v. De Jesus-Ortiz
as 23-1936
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
YAN CARLOS DE JESUS-ORTIZ, a/k/a Cepi, a/k/a Cepi El Escudo
DE-JESUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16534
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DE-JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE JESUS BARBOSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69532
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DE JESUS BARBOSA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. De Jesus
as 20-1043
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS DE JESUS, AKA Juan Carlos De Jesus-Ponce, AKA Juan Carlos Dejesus
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carlos Sanchez-Zabaleta v. William Barr
as 19-73136
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CARLOS DE JESUS SANCHEZ-ZABALETA
Carlos Santeliz-Florez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-13832
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
CARLOS DE JESUS SANTELIZ-FLOREZ
Carlos Sanchez-Zabaleta v. William Barr
as 19-71231
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CARLOS DE JESUS SANCHEZ-ZABALETA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
