Smith v. Wayside Christian Mission et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Lovell Smith
Defendant: Wayside Christian Mission, Metro Louisville Government, Captain John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2
Case Number: 3:2025cv00143
Filed: March 7, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David J Hale
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 4/10/2025: The #11 application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. In order for Smith to proceed with an appeal of this action, he must either (1) pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee in full to the Clerk of the District Court within 30 days of receiving notice of this Order or (2) file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit within 30 days of receiving notice of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). cc: Plaintiff/Appellant (pro se); Defendants/Appellees; Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (No. 25-5316) (DLW)
April 9, 2025 Filing 15 USCA Case Number 25-5316 for #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony Lovell Smith. (Case Manager: Roy G. Ford) (JM)
April 8, 2025 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re 13 MOTION to Reinstate or Recognize Notice of Appeal; Error: Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Notice of Appeal. This document has been refiled by the Clerk. Please see DN #14 for viewing. (DLW)
March 28, 2025 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #10 Order by Anthony Lovell Smith (Attachments: #1 Court of Appeals Letter) (DLW)
March 28, 2025 Filing 13 ERROR: Incorrect event selected. This document has been refiled by the Clerk. Please see DN #14 for viewing. Modified on 4/8/2025 (DLW).
March 28, 2025 Filing 12 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Notice of Deficiency and #5 Notice on Summons. Mail sent to Anthony Lovell Smith. (DLW)
March 20, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal by Plaintiff Anthony Lovell Smith. (DLW)
March 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 3/14/2025: The instant action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(b)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants (DLW)
March 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 3/14/2025 granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons stated, the complaint will be dismissed by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants (DLW)
March 10, 2025 Filing 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Anthony Lovell Smith. (DLW)
March 10, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony Lovell Smith. (DLW)
March 7, 2025 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Claims Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 re #1 Complaint by Anthony Lovell Smith. (DLW)
March 7, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. (KDY)
March 7, 2025 Filing 4 Registration to Receive Documents Electronically by Anthony Lovell Smith. (DLW)
March 7, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: No Filing Fee or Application to Proceed Without Payment. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 4/7/2025. (KDY)
March 7, 2025 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (KDY)
March 7, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES filed by Anthony Lovell Smith against Wayside Christian Mission, Metro Louisville Government, John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. (KDY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Wayside Christian Mission et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Lovell Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayside Christian Mission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metro Louisville Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain John Doe #1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe #2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?