USA v. $15,280.00 in United States Currency
| USA |
| $15,280.00 in United States Currency |
| 2:2020cv00159 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| Candace J Smith |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN: $15,280.IN USMS custody as of 04/23/2020.(KRB) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING by USA (Attachments: #1 Stipulated Settlement Agreement)(Datta, Rajbir) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: #6 Notice of Filing Stipulated Settlement Agreement. (TJZ) |
Filing 5
STANDING REFERRAL ORDER: 1) Case referred to assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge at Covington to supervise discovery and pretrial proceedings; 2) Magistrate Judge is authorized to conduct all pretrial and status conferences, to hold such hearings as may be required, and to rule on nondispositive motions, except motions in limine. Dispositive motions and motions in limine will be referred to the undersigned. The final pretrial conference and trial will also be before the undersigned, unless parties agree to a trial by a Magistrate Judge; 3) Discovery disputes shall be resolved in the following manner: (1) Parties to meet/confer in an attempt to resolve disputes; (2) If parties unable to resolve such disputes formally, they shall attempt to resolve their disagreements by telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge; 3) If parties unable to resolve their disputes after conference with the Magistrate Judge, they may file appropriate written motions with the Court, which shall include the certification required. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/13/2011.(ECO)cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 Warrant in Rem Issued as to $15,280.00 in United States Currency; original & 4 certified copies delivered to USM (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(ECO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2020: #3 certified mail receipt to USM) (TJZ). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem by USA (Attachments: #1 Warrant of Arrest, #2 USM 285)(ECO) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM (NO PROCESS REQUESTED) filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cameron C. Rice, #2 Affidavit of Cameron C. Rice, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ECO) |
| Conflict Check run. (ECO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. $15,280.00 in United States Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $15,280.00 in United States Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | Rajbir Datta, AUSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
