District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 1 - 10 of 49,134
Anderson v. Roan et al
as 3:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Chappell Roan, Harold Nale, Eilene Nale and others
Unknown:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Montgomery v. Baier et al
as 1:2025cv00669
Plaintiff:
Timothy V Montgomery
Defendant:
Baier, A DeGroot, RN Henning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Does
as 2:2025cv00668
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Christopher Jones, Jr
Defendant:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Care.stat!, Inc.d/b/a Carerev v. Litehouse Health WI, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00673
Plaintiff:
Care.stat!, Inc.d/b/a Carerev
Defendant:
Litehouse Health WI, LLC, Litehouse Health E WA, LLC, David Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Bioferm Holdings, LLC v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv00366
Plaintiff:
Bioferm Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Xiong
as 2:2025cv00664
Plaintiff:
Shawn Beasley
Defendant:
Sunny Xiong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, Heather v. Lexington Law Firm et al
as 3:2025cv00362
Plaintiff:
Heather L. Davis
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm and John C. Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
