District Court Cases in Idaho
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,895
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wylie v. USA
as 1:2025cv00248
Petitioner:
Anthony James Wylie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raynor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00247
Petitioner:
Bryce Christopher Raynor
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wondra v. United States
as 1:2025cv00241
Petitioner:
Stacey James Wondra
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Payne v. Social Security Commissioner
as 2:2025cv00239
Plaintiff:
Shaunna Lee Payne
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. AK Gang Member et al
as 1:2025cv00243
Plaintiff:
George E. Smith
Defendant:
AK Gang Member and SUC Gang Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Warden Valley, et al.,
as 1:2025cv00246
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Warden Valley, Centurion Medical Corporation, Centurion Staff, John Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BrightView Landscape Development, Inc. v. Howard
as 1:2025cv00240
Plaintiff:
BrightView Landscape Development, Inc.
Defendant:
J. Philip Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
