District Court Cases in Guam

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,180
Capfa Capital Corporation v. DB Insurance Company Limited
as 1:2025cv00020
Plaintiff: Capfa Capital Corporation
Defendant: DB Insurance Company Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Safabakhsh v. Director, Department of Revenue and Taxation
as 1:2025cv00019
Plaintiff: Saied Safabakhsh
Defendant: Director, Department of Revenue and Taxation
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1424 The Organic Act of Guam
Iriarte v. Redila
as 1:2025cv00018
Plaintiff: Patrick Iriarte
Defendant: Rosemary Redila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 1:2025cv00016
Plaintiff: Mark S. Smith
Defendant: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Administrative and judicial review - restoration of rights
Card v. Oaks
as 1:2025cv00010
Plaintiff: Tony Lamar Card
Defendant: Lloyd D Oaks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Kiesel
as 1:2025cv00011
Plaintiff: Tony Lamar Card
Defendant: Diana L. Kiesel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Sorenson
as 1:2025cv00012
Plaintiff: Tony Lamar Card
Defendant: Philip K. Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Card v. Henderson
as 1:2025cv00013
Plaintiff: Tony Lamar Card
Defendant: Clarence Henderson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Blinn
as 1:2025cv00014
Plaintiff: Tony Lamar Card
Defendant: Grant Blinn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?