U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 27,728
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2025cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TATE v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2025cv00069
Petitioner:
ELBERT TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN JOHNSON STATE PRISON and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. WALTON SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 3:2025cv00070
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTON SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. WORLD CLASS ACTION ALL SEVEN CONTINENTS
as 5:2025cv00186
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
WORLD CLASS ACTION ALL SEVEN CONTINENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ARROYO v. FRANKLIN et al
as 3:2025cv00071
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, TERRY HARRIS, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PONDER v. BLOODSAW
as 5:2025cv00185
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH PONDER
Defendant:
GEORGIA BLOODSAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. BEASLEY
as 7:2025cv00058
Petitioner:
KELVIN E BROWN
Respondent:
JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSA v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2025cv00068
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSA
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 4:2025cv00149
Plaintiff:
KIRBY LYNN JACOBS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
