Alabama Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,699
Tidmore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2025cv00721
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S. Tidmore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Streeter v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2025cv00699
Plaintiff:
Deshon Streeter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morgan v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv00316
Plaintiff:
Christy Morgan
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murphy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2025cv00636
Plaintiff:
Randall Dee Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Craig v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2025cv00536
Plaintiff:
Carolyn L Craig
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hutchenson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2025cv00476
Plaintiff:
Angelia M. Hutchenson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Young v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joe G. Young
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bento v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bento
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Turk v. Dudek (CONSENT)
as 3:2025cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tonya Turk
Defendant:
Lee Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hefner v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2025cv00172
Plaintiff:
Lisa Raye Hefner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
