District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 93,602
Bardell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2025cv00712
Plaintiff:
John Bardell
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vann v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv00710
Plaintiff:
Whittney Vann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ramos et al v. Rajwindersingh et al
as 4:2025cv00715
Plaintiff:
Benny Ramos, Jr and Jayne Ramos
Defendant:
Rajwindersingh and Dhaliwal Brothers Tractor Trailering Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Partridge v. Jackson
as 2:2025cv00717
Plaintiff:
Brett F Partridge
Defendant:
Antwan D Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Partridge v. Frey et al
as 2:2025cv00718
Plaintiff:
Brett F Partridge
Defendant:
Jr Frey and Jeremy Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Owens v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Alabama Inc et al
as 3:2025cv00713
Plaintiff:
Rickey Owens
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Manufacturing Alabama Inc and Toyota Manufacturing North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pseudo Force Studio LLC v. Strokin Diesel LLC
as 2:2025cv00709
Plaintiff:
Pseudo Force Studio LLC
Defendant:
Strokin Diesel LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
