Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,460
Deivaprakash v. Conde Nast Digital
as 3:2025cv04021
Plaintiff:
Aaron Deivaprakash
Defendant:
Conde Nast Digital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Flaskerud-Rathmell v. Franks et al
as 3:2025cv04031
Plaintiff:
Susan Flaskerud-Rathmell
Defendant:
Emily Franks, Iain Franks and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matsumura v. Nealy
as 4:2025cv04012
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Matsumura
Defendant:
Michael Eugene Nealy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ACIMOVIC v. Macy's, Inc.
as 4:2025cv04029
Plaintiff:
ALEKSANDAR ACIMOVIC
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ord v. Princess Cruises Lines Ltd
as 2:2025cv04148
Plaintiff:
Jeffre Ord
Defendant:
Princess Cruises Lines Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tapia v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2025cv04156
Plaintiff:
Maria Tapia
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Epifanio v. Airstream Inc. et al
as 8:2025cv00976
Plaintiff:
Choc Epifanio
Defendant:
Airstream Inc. and Does 1-100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zielinski v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2025cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lynn Allison Zielinski
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Doe Corporations 1-5, Doe Entities 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Broughton v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.
as 4:2025cv03986
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Broughton
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rodriguez-Sorto v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2025at00368
Plaintiff:
Alexis Rodriguez-Sorto
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc. and Golden State Annex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
