Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 97,260
Mogent et al v. Ramos
as 3:2025cv00089
Plaintiff:
Katie Mogent and Natalyia Mogent
Defendant:
Andy Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE KGDB 007 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03998
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE KGDB 007
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DOE KGDB 008 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03999
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE KGDB 008
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DOE KGDB 009 v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 3:2025cv04001
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE KGDB 009
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DOE KGDB 010 v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 3:2025cv04011
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE KGDB 010
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DOE KGDB 011 v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 3:2025cv04015
Plaintiff:
John Doe KGDB 011
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Deivaprakash v. Conde Nast Digital
as 3:2025cv04021
Plaintiff:
Aaron Deivaprakash
Defendant:
Conde Nast Digital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Flaskerud-Rathmell v. Franks et al
as 3:2025cv04031
Plaintiff:
Susan Flaskerud-Rathmell
Defendant:
Emily Franks, Iain Franks and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matsumura v. Nealy
as 4:2025cv04012
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Matsumura
Defendant:
Michael Eugene Nealy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ACIMOVIC v. Macy's, Inc.
as 4:2025cv04029
Plaintiff:
ALEKSANDAR ACIMOVIC
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
