U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,916
Postelmans v. Whispers Gentelmen's Club et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Speten et al v. Sharda USA LLC et al
as 1:2025cv00105
Plaintiff:
Nathan Speten, Troy Speten, Gary Speten and others
Defendant:
Sharda USA LLC, CJB Industries, Inc. and Outsource Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glaum v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2025cv00104
Petitioner:
Joseph E. Glaum
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohamed v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ali Hassan Mohamed
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Global Weather Productions LLC v. Bakken Beacon Media, LLC
as 3:2025cv00101
Plaintiff:
Global Weather Productions LLC
Defendant:
Bakken Beacon Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Reed Timmer v. Bakken Beacon Media, LLC
as 3:2025cv00102
Plaintiff:
Reed Timmer
Defendant:
Bakken Beacon Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Kiser v. Kjelland et al
as 3:2025cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kiser
Defendant:
Chad Kjelland, Kjelland Excavation, Lyle Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
