District Court Cases in Wisconsin
Cases 1 - 10 of 49,143
Schneider v. Well Point Care Network
as 2:2025cv00676
Plaintiff:
Richard A Schneider
Defendant:
Well Point Care Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lush v. Hensle et al
as 2:2025cv00677
Petitioner:
William Stephen Lush, II
Respondent:
Michael E Hensle, Michelle C Schwartz, Christine Decot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 ADA - Discrimination
Boundless, LLC v. Marina Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00369
Plaintiff:
Boundless, LLC
Defendant:
Marina Management, Inc. and City of Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bengtson, Mitchell v. Department of Natural Resources et al
as 3:2025cv00368
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bengtson
Defendant:
Department of Natural Resources, Jennifer McDonough, Kyle Kosin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blum, Kimberly v. American Accounts & Advisers, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00367
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Blum
Defendant:
American Accounts & Advisers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Montgomery v. Baier et al
as 1:2025cv00669
Plaintiff:
Timothy V Montgomery
Defendant:
Baier, A DeGroot, RN Henning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
