Seventh Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 87,164
Vargas, Giovanny v. Department of Homeland Security

as 3:2025cv00372
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eggleston, Jermaine v. Emmerich, Warden

as 3:2025cv00326
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv05191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arman v. Al Piemonte Nissan, Inc.,
as 1:2025cv05181
Plaintiff:
Hazem Arman
Defendant:
Al Piemonte Nissan, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2025cv05143
Plaintiff:
Givenchy SA
Defendant:
000-Leo, 0880-ama, emmanuelle-vip and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bixler v. Yardi Systems, Inc.
as 1:2025cv05149
Plaintiff:
Brad Bixler
Defendant:
Yardi Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv50214
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Stevens v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2025cv05144
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stevens
Defendant:
Department of the Army and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Flores Valladares et al v. USCIS
as 1:2025cv05187
Plaintiff:
Henry Flores Valladares, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, DHS Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant:
USCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Flores Valladares v. USCIS et al
as 1:2025cv05192
Plaintiff:
Henry Flores Valladares
Defendant:
USCIS, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, DHS Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.