Kentucky Torts - Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 850
AmGUARD Insurance Company v. Broan-Nutone, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00617
Defendant:
Jakel Motors, Inc., Jakel, Incorporated and Broan-Nutone, LLC
Plaintiff:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Vowels et al v. DISH Wireless, L.L.C.
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
DISH Wireless, L.L.C. doing business as Boost Mobile other EchoStar
Plaintiff:
LLC Consulting and Lesley Vowels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vowels v. The State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Defendant:
Collin Anthony Watkins, Jefferson County Judicial Center, Corey A. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morris v. Schmitt
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nathan Morris
Defendant:
Jessica Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
Hodges v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Justin Hodges
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tipmore v. Aristocrat Leisure, Ltd. et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Defendant:
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., Aristocrat Leisure, Ltd. and Product Madness, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Scott Tipmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Tipmore v. Playstudios US, LLC
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
Playstudios US, LLC
Plaintiff:
James Scott Tipmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jenkins v. Yellow Social Interactive, LTD.
as 4:2024cv00091
Defendant:
Yellow Social Interactive, LTD.
Plaintiff:
Wade Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fuqua v. Sciplay Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Sciplay Games, LLC and Sciplay Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dianne Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cayce v. VGW, Ltd et al
as 4:2024cv00086
Defendant:
VGW US, Inc., VGW Luckyland Inc., VGW, Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Cayce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
