U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Cases 41 - 50 of 10,529
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Hamilton
as 6:2025cv00120
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Uptegrove et al
as 6:2025cv00119
Plaintiff:
Chad William Reed
Defendant:
Mark D. Uptegrove, Mark Matloft, Emily Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Power v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2025cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kevin Laroy Power
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cox v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2025cv00118
Plaintiff:
Krystal Jean Cox
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hammamieh v. Gallegos et al
as 6:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alaaeddin Hammamieh
Defendant:
Shayla Gallegos, Okmulgee County Sheriff's Office, Gary McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 6:2025cv00113
Petitioner:
Bryan Udale Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Meeks v. Tucker
as 6:2025cv00114
Petitioner:
Lon Brandon Meeks
Respondent:
Joey Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iribhogbe v. Clark et al
as 6:2025cv00112
Plaintiff:
Edgal Iribhogbe
Defendant:
Shannon Clark, Christopher Cook, Greech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
