Cases 41 - 50 of 564
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co v. High End Development, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01909
Defendant:
High End Development, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The County Commissiion of Fayette County, WV v. National Grid NE Holdings 2 LLC
as 24-1590
Defendant:
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, a New Hampshire coporation, solely to the extent of coverage available pursuant to liability insurance policies issued by it expressly providing coverage to Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates or any of its subsidiaries, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation successor in interest to, PARDEE AND CURTAIN REALTY LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company qualified to do business in West Virginia and others
Cross-Defendant:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North America, and as successor to CIGNA Specialty Insurance Company formerly known as California Union Insurance Company, FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CILIBERTI, Esq, Fayette County Prosecuting Attorney and FAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION, a political subdivision of the State of West Virginia
Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv03477
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
Madison House Presents LLC, Everest National Insurance Company, Apex Event Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. et al v. Congressional Iron Works, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance, Co.
Defendant:
Congressional Iron Works, Inc. and The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
United States, County of Alameda and Cross Link Inc. doing business as Westar Marine Services
Cross-Defendant:
County of Alameda
Cross-Complainant:
Cross Link Inc. doing business as Westar Marine Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Bozzuto Management Company v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
as 1:2024cv04305
Plaintiff:
Bozzuto Management Company
Defendant:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
Spitz v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
The Berry Firm P.L.L.C., Settlepou, P.C., Randy Spitz and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Western Waterproofing Company, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Company
as 24-1234
Not Yet Classified:
WESTERN WATERPROOFING COMPANY, INC., BDG GOTHAM RESIDENTIAL, LLC and ZDG, LLC
Intervenor:
NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY, STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY, BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLIED WORLD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY (U.S) INC. and others
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. E.F. Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv03762
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
E.F. Corporation doing business as West Motor Freight of PA, ABC Great Logistics Inc., Qi Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv03309
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
