Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
State of Washington, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-807
Plaintiff: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAS FUTURE, INC., ANDREW STEVEN BIGGS, BENJAMIN LEE CLINE and others
State of Colorado, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al.
as 24-7265
Plaintiff: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF WISCONSIN and others
Defendant: META PLATFORMS, INC., META PAYMENTS, INC., META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
People of the State of California, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc., et al.
as 24-7032
Plaintiff: STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel Joshua H. Stein Attorney General and others
Defendant: META PLATFORMS, INC., META PAYMENTS, INC., META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Moore, et al. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 24-5569
Plaintiff: STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two, STATE OF ARKANSAS, ex rel Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ex rel Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two and others
Defendant: REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., REGENERON HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant: Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Mike Moyle, Speaker of Idaho House Representatives We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-35450
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner / Appellant: MIKE MOYLE, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, CHUCK WINDER, President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate and THE SIXTY-SEVENTH IDAHO LEGISLATURE, Proposed Intevenor-Defendants
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and STATE OF INDIANA, AND 18 OTHER STATES
USA v. State of Idaho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-35440
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and STATE OF INDIANA, AND 18 OTHER STATES
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?