Ratliff v. King
Jeffrey Wayne Ratliff |
Michelle King |
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
4:2025cv00730 |
February 13, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Peter Bray |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STIPULATION re: Proposed Briefing Schedule by Michelle King, filed. (Jenkins, Elvi) |
![]() |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Jeffrey Wayne Ratliff, filed. (Andrews, James) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Elvi D. Jenkins on behalf of Michelle King, filed. (Jenkins, Elvi) |
Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent / Declination to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge in a Social Security case. Parties notified, filed. (bli4) |
Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bli4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michelle King (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Jeffrey Wayne Ratliff. (Application to Proceed IFP Granted on 2/13/2025 by Judge Charles Eskridge) (bli4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.