Calavo Growers, Inc., v. Pupo Logistics LLC.
| CALAVO GROWERS, INC., and Calavo Growers, Inc. |
| PUPO LOGISTICS LLC. and Pupo Logistics LLC |
| 4:2020cv02081 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Pupo Logistics LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Pupo Logistics LLC, filed.(Martin, Dana) |
| Summons Not Issued as to All Defendants due to these deficiencies: C/o individuals should each have their own Summons form. Attorney or Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Martin, Dana) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/9/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24794211) filed by CALAVO GROWERS, INC.,.(Martin, Dana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
