Dymatize Enterprises, LLC v. Defiance Brands, Inc. et al
Dymatize Enterprises, LLC |
Defiance Brands, Inc., Dan Maddox, II and Brian Burgdorf |
3:2024cv00152 |
February 8, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Alistair Newbern |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 18 NOTICE by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC Joint Notice of Tentative Settlement (Cardwell, Christopher) |
![]() |
Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Brian Burgdorf, Defiance Brands, Inc., Dan Maddox, II. (Ramsey, William) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by William T. Ramsey on behalf of All Defendants (Ramsey, William) |
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION for attorney Matthew A. Braunel to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-4015515) by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of M. Braunel, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing)(Cardwell, Christopher) |
![]() |
Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. Defiance Brands, Inc. served on 2/13/2024. (Cardwell, Christopher) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. Dan Maddox, II served on 2/13/2024. (Cardwell, Christopher) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. Brian Burgdorf served on 2/12/2024. (Cardwell, Christopher) |
Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Brendan M. Bement to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number ATNMDC-4013149) by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - B Bement's EXECUTED Declaration for Pro Hac Vice Motion, #2 Exhibit B - B. Bement's Certificate of Good Standing)(Cardwell, Christopher) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Matthew Braunel, Brendan M. Bement: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 3/5/2024. (kc) |
Filing 7 Summons issued as to Brian Burgdorf, Defiance Brands, Inc., Dan Maddox, II. Service packet placed at intake window for counsel to pick up. HOURS: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., Monday - Friday. (kc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 4/8/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (kc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (kc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 217 to parties re obligation of counsel to keep Court apprised of current contact information. (kc) |
Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. (kc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian Burgdorf, Defiance Brands, Inc., Dan Maddox, II (Filing fee $405, Receipt number ATNMDC-4008972), filed by Dymatize Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Registration Certificate for U.S. Reg. No. 5147587, #2 Exhibit 2 Registration Certificate for U.S. Reg. No. 6197061, #3 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc) |
MO State Bar status verified as active for Matthew Braunel, Brendan M. Bement not admitted to this court - Local counsel secured. (kc) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Christopher W. Cardwell, Gabriel Bayley Ragsdale admitted to this court. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.