Rogers v. U.S. Bankcorp
| Courtney Roers |
| U.S. Bancorp |
| 2:2025cv00069 |
| April 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 ERISA |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Bancorp ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNEDC-5972887.), filed by Courtney Roers. (Attachments: #1 Other civil cover sheet, #2 Summons)(Darnell, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. U.S. Bankcorp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Courtney Roers | |
| Represented By: | David N Darnell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Bancorp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
