Beeqb LLC v. Blockquarry Corp et al
| Beeqb LLC |
| Pantheon Resources Inc, ISW Holdings Inc and Blockquarry Corp |
| 7:2024cv03179 |
| May 23, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Defendant Pantheon ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by Pantheon Resources Inc.(Grissom, Trenton) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Trenton Michael Grissom on behalf of Pantheon Resources Inc (Grissom, Trenton) |
| Filing 11 REPLY by Beeqb LLC to 9 Order. (Newman, Graham) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Beeqb LLC. Blockquarry Corp waiver executed on 6/10/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Waiver of the Service of Summons)(Newman, Graham) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER. Jurisdiction in this matter is predicated upon diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff Beeqb LLC is to inform the court of the citizenship of all its members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied. See 28 U.S.C. 1332; Gen. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda, 388 F. 3d 114, 121 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding that "[a limited liability company] is an unincorporated association, akin to a partnership for diversity purposes, whose citizenship is that of its members."); see also Local Rule 26.01(H) (D.S.C.). Entered at the direction of the Honorable Chief Judge Timothy M Cain on 6/10/24. (Reply to Order due by 6/20/2024.)(kmca) |
| Filing 8 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER #6 Acceptance of Service. Reason: re-filed by attorney to correct event and add signed notice of filing, Corrected Filing Document Number #7 Summons Returned Executed. Modified filing date to that of original filing: 6/5/24. (kmca) Modified on 6/7/2024: to correct link ( #7 ) (kmca). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Beeqb LLC. Pantheon Resources Inc served on 6/3/2024, answer due 6/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Affidavit of Service)(Newman, Graham) Modified on 6/7/2024: to correct date filed, to add text (service and answer dates) (kmca). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Blockquarry Corp, Pantheon Resources Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Pantheon Resources Inc)(kmca) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Beeqb LLC.(kmca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blockquarry Corp, Pantheon Resources Inc (Filing fee $405 receipt number ASCDC-11783911), filed by Beeqb LLC. Service due by 8/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Hosting Agreement, #2 Exhibit B--Sale and Purchase Agreement, #3 Exhibit C--Beeqb v. Uptime Hosting Complaint, #4 Exhibit D--Blockquarry v. Litchain Complaint, #5 Exhibit E--April 21, 2023 Demand Letter, #6 Exhibit F--April 24, 2023 Response Letter, #7 Exhibit G--November 2, 2023 Stipulation of Dismissal, #8 Exhibit H--November 14, 2023 Email, #9 Exhibit I--Exchanges with Blockquarry Counsel, #10 Exhibit J--December 20, 2023 Demand Letter, #11 Exhibit K--Blockquarry Response, #12 Exhibit L--Blockquarry Demand Response, #13 Exhibit M--Miner Spreadsheet, #14 Exhibit N--Electric Consumption Table, #15 Exhibit O--February 19-20 Email Exchange, #16 Exhibit P--March 15, 2024 Email, #17 Exhibit Q--Withdrawal of Counsel)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
