Triad Engineering & Contracting Company v. Carolina Bridge Co., Inc. et al
| Triad Engineering and Contracting Company and Triad Engineering & Contracting Company |
| Carolina Bridge Co Inc, Arch Insurance Company and Carolina Bridge Co., Inc. |
| 5:2021cv04138 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Patrick Kelley on behalf of Carolina Bridge Co., Inc. (Kelley, Bryan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Mason A Goldsmith, Jr on behalf of Carolina Bridge Co., Inc. (Goldsmith, Mason) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Arch Insurance Company, Carolina Bridge Co., Inc.. (Anderson, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: Upon review of Defendants' response to this Court's order to show cause, it is unclear to this Court if counsel is aware that there is no federal courthouse in Orangeburg, SC, and that all Orangeburg cases are heard and managed in the federal courthouse located in Columbia, SC. That being said, Defendants may file an amended response to the order no later than January 14, 2022, if that information has any bearing on their response. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Amended Response (if any) due by 1/14/2022) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/10/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Arch Insurance Company, Carolina Bridge Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of S. McDaniel Nickel)(Anderson, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 REPLY by Arch Insurance Company, Carolina Bridge Co., Inc. Statement Regarding Removal. (Anderson, Matthew) Modified to add filer listed on document on 1/4/2022 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: It appears to this Court that this action would most properly be filed in the Charleston Division in accordance with Local Civil Rule 3.01(A)(1). The Court, therefore, directs Defendants to show cause why this action should not be transferred to the Charleston Division and reassigned to a Charleston Division judge. Defendants shall respond to this order no later than January 7, 2022. If Plaintiff would also like to respond, it may do so no later than that same date. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Show Cause Response due by 1/7/2022) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/3/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Arch Insurance Company.(Anderson, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Carolina Bridge Co Inc.(Jones, Alan) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Carolina Bridge Co Inc.(Jones, Alan) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing _Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. ( Reply due by 1/4/2022.) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/28/2021. (mdea ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Arch Insurance Company.(bshr, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-10-4946. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10251532), filed by Arch Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(bshr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
