Kennon et al v. City of Union
| Deborah Kennon and Johnny Kennon |
| City of Union |
| 2:2025cv00826 |
| May 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Andrew D Hallman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to City of Union. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rks) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/12/2025. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/14/2025. Pretrial Order is due by 10/14/2025. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (rks)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9849349 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Deborah Kennon, Johnny Kennon against City of Union (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Hostetter, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
