Strother v. MidFirst Bank
Andrew Strother |
MidFirst Bank |
5:2023cv00995 |
November 3, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Jodi W Dishman |
Stephen P Friot |
Banks and Banking |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Docket Annotation: Case transferred from Oklahoma Western has been opened in District of Massachusetts as case 1:23-cv-12898, filed 11/29/2023. (rp) |
Filing 14 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER transferring case to District of District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Judge Allison D. Burroughs. Signed by Clerk of the Panel. (naa) |
Docket Annotation: Case sent to District of Massachusetts (naa) |
Filing 13 ENTRY of Appearance by Jason K Fagelman on behalf of MidFirst Bank (Fagelman, Jason) |
Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - CORPORATE by MidFirst Bank . (Rother, Timila) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Petition by MidFirst Bank. (Rother, Timila) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jason Fagelman Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AOKWDC-4290790 by MidFirst Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. 1 - JKF Request for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Rother, Timila) |
Filing 6 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jodi W. Dishman for all further proceedings. Entered at the direction of Judge Stephen P. Friot on 11/6/2023. (llg) |
![]() |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Anthony J Hendricks on behalf of MidFirst Bank (Hendricks, Anthony) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by William H Hoch, III on behalf of MidFirst Bank (Hoch, William) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Timila S Rother on behalf of MidFirst Bank (Rother, Timila) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2023-5736 filed by MidFirst Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Petition, #2 Exhibit 2- Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit 3- Summons, #4 Exhibit 4- Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit 5- EOA Hilton, #6 Exhibit 6- EOR Rother, #7 Exhibit 7- Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, #8 Exhibit 8- Order, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(dtb) |
PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AOKWDC-4287224. (Rother, Timila) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strother v. MidFirst Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew Strother | |
Represented By: | David Lietz |
Represented By: | William B Federman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MidFirst Bank | |
Represented By: | Anthony J Hendricks |
Represented By: | Timila S Rother |
Represented By: | William H Hoch, III |
Represented By: | Jason K Fagelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.