Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. v. ARKK Trucking, Inc.
| Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. |
| ARKK Trucking, Inc. |
| 4:2025cv00062 |
| February 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Mark T Steele |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. (McPhail, Mark) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark T Steele Counsel for Plaintiff is advised that Plaintiff's disclosure statement is now past due. (Docket No. 5). Plaintiff is hereby directed to file said disclosure statement using the form available on the Court's website by March 5, 2025. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (lmt, Dpty Clk)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to ARKK Trucking, Inc. (atn, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (atn, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk , directing Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. to file a Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCvP 7.1 and LCvR 7.1-1, if applicable. The parties shall use the form entitled Disclosure Statement available on the Courts website. (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (atn, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Taylor Kaye Weder on behalf of Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. (McPhail, Mark) Modified on 2/5/2025 to show added attorney (cjb, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark R McPhail on behalf of Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. (McPhail, Mark) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ARKK Trucking, Inc. (paid $405 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-3151300) by Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. (McPhail, Mark) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. (McPhail, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. v. ARKK Trucking, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Taylor Kaye Weder |
| Represented By: | Mark R McPhail |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ARKK Trucking, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
