ASTRAZENECA AB et al v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC.
| ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED and ASTRAZENECA AB |
| ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. |
| 1:2018cv00731 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Plaintiffs ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED. (BORCHERS, LYNNE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2413471.), filed by ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - DNJ Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - US6774122, #3 Exhibit C - US7456160, #4 Exhibit D - US8329680, #5 Exhibit E - US8466139, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(BORCHERS, LYNNE) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
