CELGENE CORPORATION v. SYNTHON PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
CELGENE CORPORATION |
ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC, SYNTHON PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SYNTHON S.R.O. and SYNTHON B.V. |
2:2019cv09737 |
April 12, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Hammer |
Esther Salas |
Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID LEIGH MOSES on behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION (MOSES, DAVID) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by SARAH ANN SULLIVAN on behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION (SULLIVAN, SARAH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM C. BATON on behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION (BATON, WILLIAM) |
Filing 4 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jr) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC, SYNTHON B.V., SYNTHON PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SYNTHON S.R.O. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CELGENE CORPORATION. (LIZZA, CHARLES) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC, SYNTHON B.V., SYNTHON PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SYNTHON S.R.O. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9577111), filed by CELGENE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LIZZA, CHARLES) |
Case assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.