Reynolds v. Checkr Group, Inc.
| Dajuana Reynolds |
| Checkr Group, Inc. |
| 8:2024cv00069 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Brian C Buescher |
| Michael D Nelson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant shall have an extension of time to April 29, 2024, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Leah A. Tedford on behalf of Defendant Checkr Group, Inc..(Tedford, Leah) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant Checkr Group, Inc. on 2/26/2024. (Babad, Eliyahu) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendant shall have an extension of time to April 15, 2024, to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (SMN)
|
| Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Leah A. Tedford on behalf of Defendant Checkr Group, Inc..(Tedford, Leah) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to defendant Checkr Group, Inc. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JES) |
| Filing 3 Summons Requested as to Proposed Checkr Group, Inc. regarding Complaint, #1 . (Babad, Eliyahu) |
| Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Brian C. Buescher and Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (JES) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Checkr Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5034508), by Attorney Eliyahu R. Babad on behalf of Dajuana Reynolds (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Proposed Summons for Checkr Group, Inc.)(Babad, Eliyahu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reynolds v. Checkr Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dajuana Reynolds | |
| Represented By: | Eliyahu R. Babad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Checkr Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Leah A. Tedford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
