Battery Handling Systems, Inc. v. BHS Corrugated Maschinen-und Anlagenbau GmbH et al
Plaintiff: Battery Handling Systems, Inc. doing business as BHS, Inc.
Defendant: BHS Corrugated Maschinen-und Anlagenbau GmbH and BHS Intralogistics GmbH
Case Number: 4:2025cv00152
Filed: February 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Noelle C Collins
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2025 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael William Carwin for Plaintiff Battery Handling Systems, Inc.. (Carwin, Michael)
February 7, 2025 Filing 5 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding trademark. (JWD)
February 7, 2025 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. 2 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Mark A. Thomas. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD)
February 6, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Battery Handling Systems, Inc. Process Server: Civil Action Group (Thomas, Mark)
February 6, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Battery Handling Systems, Inc. Process Server: Civil Action Group (Thomas, Mark)
February 6, 2025 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Battery Handling Systems, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Thomas, Mark)
February 6, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant BHS Corrugated Maschinen-und Anlagenbau GmbH, BHS Intralogistics GmbH with receipt number AMOEDC-11077314, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Battery Handling Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Trademark Registrations, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Summons BHS CMA, #5 Summons BHS Intralogistics)(Thomas, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Battery Handling Systems, Inc. v. BHS Corrugated Maschinen-und Anlagenbau GmbH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Battery Handling Systems, Inc. doing business as BHS, Inc.
Represented By: Mark A. Thomas
Represented By: Michael William Carwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BHS Corrugated Maschinen-und Anlagenbau GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BHS Intralogistics GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?