Harrison v. Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. et al
| William C. Harrison |
| Jewelers Board of Trade and Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. |
| 1:2024cv00095 |
| May 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Debra M Brown |
| David A Sanders |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE by John Stephen Graham on behalf of Jewelers Board of Trade re #4 MOTION to Transfer Venue Consent to Motion to Transfer Venue (Graham, John) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by Jewelers Board of Trade. (Graham, John) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Shane McLaughlin on behalf of William C. Harrison Jewelers Board of Trade served on 5/30/2024. (McLaughlin, Richard) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Transfer Venue. Replies due by 7/25/2024. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/18/2024. (lld)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Transfer Venue by Kim International Manufacturing, L.P.. (Maddalena, Yvonne) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE of Past Due Answer as to Kim International Manufacturing L.P. (jla) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #11 Response in Opposition to #4 Motion filed by William C. Harrison. (McLaughlin, Richard) Modified on 7/12/2024 to link to motion (jwr). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by William C. Harrison. (McLaughlin, Richard) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint . Jewelers Board of Trade answer or other responsive pleading due 7/19/2024. No further order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 7/10/24. No document attached. (def)
|
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. . (Maddalena, Yvonne) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Graham Ross Pulvere on behalf of Jewelers Board of Trade (Pulvere, Graham) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Stephen Graham on behalf of Jewelers Board of Trade (Graham, John) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Jewelers Board of Trade. (Graham, John) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF re #4 MOTION to Transfer Venue . (Maddalena, Yvonne) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Venue by Kim International Manufacturing, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sales Representative Agreement) (Maddalena, Yvonne) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process Re: Jewelers Board of Trade. (lgm) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Shane McLaughlin on behalf of William C. Harrison Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. served on 6/7/2024. (McLaughlin, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jewelers Board of Trade and Kim International Manufacturing, L.P. Counsel is instructed to download and print for service. (lgm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMSNDC-2390637, filed by William C. Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lgm) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (lgm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
