United States of America v. $27,400.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| $27,400.00 in U.S. Currency, $1,580.00 in U.S. Currency and A Glock 21 .45 Caliber Handgun Bearing Serial Number YLW581 |
| 0:2023cv03535 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| David T Schultz |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WARRANT Returned Executed as to $27,400.00 in U.S. Currency et al. (kt) Document QC'd on 12/14/2023 (DLO). |
| Filing 3 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM issued. (kt) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 23-cv-3535 (PJS/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $1,580.00 in U.S. Currency, $27,400.00 in U.S. Currency, A Glock 21.45 Caliber Handgun Bearing Serial Number YLW581 filed by United States of America. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Askew, Quinn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
