Wohlscheid v. Easton Technical Products, Inc. et al
| Craig Wohlscheid |
| Easton Technical Products Inc., Unknown Party #16, Unknown Party #19, Unknown Party #9, Unknown Party #23, Unknown Party #11, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #18, Unknown Party #8, Unknown Party #5, Unknown Party #10, Unknown Party #15, Unknown Party #20, Unknown Party #13, Easton Technical Products, Inc., Unknown Party #4, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #14, Unknown Party #7, Unknown Party #21, Unknown Party #12, Unknown Party #17, Unknown Party #22, Unknown Party #6 and Unknown Party #3 |
| 1:2019cv01046 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re UNOPPOSED MOTION to withdraw as attorney #10 filed by Craig Wohlscheid (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - e-mails seeking concurrence) (Bostic, J.) |
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION to withdraw as attorney by plaintiff Craig Wohlscheid; (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bostic, J.) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Dennis Anthony Mastando on behalf of plaintiff Craig Wohlscheid (Mastando, Dennis) |
Filing 9
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 2/27/2020 at 10:00 AM at 650 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens; status report due by 2/24/2020; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jal)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Easton Technical Products, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Jas D. Easton, Inc. for Easton Technical Products, Inc. (Menuez, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to complaint,, #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Easton Technical Products, Inc. (Menuez, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER approving STIPULATION #5 ; deadline for defendant Easton Technical Products, Inc. to file responsive pleading extended to 1/31/2020; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond by defendant Easton Technical Products, Inc. [Attorney Jonathan M. Menuez added to party Easton Technical Products, Inc.(pty:dft)] (Menuez, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Easton Technical Products, Inc. (ems) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (kw) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Easton Technical Products, Inc. (filing fee due) (kw) Modified text on 12/16/2019 (ems). |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Craig Wohlscheid in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4698721 (Bostic, J.) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Bostic, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Easton Technical Products, Inc., Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #10, Unknown Party #11, Unknown Party #12, Unknown Party #13, Unknown Party #14, Unknown Party #15, Unknown Party #16, Unknown Party #17, Unknown Party #18, Unknown Party #19, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #20, Unknown Party #21, Unknown Party #22, Unknown Party #23, Unknown Party #3, Unknown Party #4, Unknown Party #5, Unknown Party #6, Unknown Party #7, Unknown Party #8, Unknown Party #9 filed by Craig Wohlscheid (Bostic, J.) Modified text on 12/16/2019 (ems). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
