Beck v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. et al
| Chad Beck |
| Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., Shell Offshore Inc., Enhanced Drilling, Inc. and SubSea Solutions, LLC |
| 2:2025cv00250 |
| February 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Brandon S Long |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 30104 Marine Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Shell Offshore Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Shell plc for Shell Offshore Inc. (Baynham, Alexander) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Shell Offshore Inc..(Baynham, Alexander) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc..(Waguespack, Constance) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Shell Offshore Inc., answer due 3/27/2025. Signed by Judge Brandon S. Long on 3/27/2025. (meb)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, as to Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. answer due 3/27/2025. Signed by Judge Brandon S. Long on 3/5/2025. (mmm)
|
| Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Shell Offshore Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Alexander J Baynham added to party Shell Offshore Inc. (pty:dft).(Baynham, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer plaintiff's Complaint for Damages by Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Constance C Waguespack added to party Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc.(pty:dft).(Waguespack, Constance) |
| Filing 6 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #5 Summons Returned Executed: Document 5-1 submitted as irregularly sized document. Local Rule 10.1 E: All papers drafted for filing in this court shall be on 8-1/2 by 11. Clerk has reduced images. No further action needed. (meb) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Enhanced Drilling, Inc. served on 2/14/2025, answer due 3/7/2025; Shell Offshore Inc. served on 2/13/2025, answer due 3/6/2025; SubSea Solutions, LLC served on 2/13/2025, answer due 3/6/2025; Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. served on 2/13/2025, answer due 3/6/2025. (Attachments: #1 Summons Return Executed, #2 Summons Return Executed, #3 Summons Return Executed)(DeGruy, Jacques) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/25/2025) (meb). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by SubSea Solutions, LLC.Attorney Richard Abelard Cozad added to party SubSea Solutions, LLC(pty:dft).(Cozad, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Enhanced Drilling, Inc., Shell Offshore Inc., SubSea Solutions, LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(car) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Brandon S. Long and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc) |
| Filing 1 SEAMAN COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10871177) filed by Chad Beck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Enhanced Drilling, #3 Summons Shell Offshore, #4 Summons Subsea Solution, #5 Summons Transocean)Attorney Jacques P. DeGruy added to party Chad Beck(pty:pla).(DeGruy, Jacques) Modified text on 2/5/2025 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
