Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The et al
Scott B. Sullivan |
Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The, Carol Morris, Laduska Anne Haney, Zeke Delgado, Mike Fiske, Twin Cities Fire Insurance Company, Berkshire Hathaway, United States Liability Insurance Company, Concentra, Tegumsen Wakwaya, Premier Spine Care, John Ciccarelli, Amy Slesky, St. Luke's South Primary Care and Stephen Nolker |
2:2022cv02095 |
March 9, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
Daniel D Crabtree |
Angel D Mitchell |
Kathryn H Vratil |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA re #31 Amended Notice of Appeal. (Appeal No. 22-3118) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Packet)(kas) |
Filing 31 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #14 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment by Scott B. Sullivan (Sullivan, Scott) |
![]() |
Filing 29 RECORD ON APPEAL retrieved by 10CCA re #14 Notice of Appeal. (Appeal No. 22-3118) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kas) |
Filing 28 DOCKET ANNOTATION: re #27 Supplemental Preliminary Record on Appeal, the incorrect pdf document was attached to the original entry and has been blocked from public view; the correct one has been attached to the entry and to this annotation for noticing purposes only. (kas) |
Filing 27 SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA Volume 1 re #14 Notice of Appeal. (Appeal No. 22-3118) (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Packet)(kas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/30/2022: #2 Corrected Supplemental Preliminary Record Letter) (kas). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 24 OBJECTION to #23 Report and Recommendations UNDER RULE 59(e) by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan(Sullivan, Scott) |
Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Scott B. Sullivan's MOTION to Amend the Judgment Under Rule 59(e) #13 be denied. Objections to R&R due by 8/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on July 21, 2022. Mailed to pro se party Scott B. Sullivan by regular and certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7010 2780 0003 1928 0956. (mls) |
Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Scott B. Sullivan.(Sullivan, Scott) |
Filing 21 Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge re #19 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan(Sullivan, Scott) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 18 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Sullivan, Scott) |
![]() |
Filing 16 APPEAL DOCKETED in 10CCA on 6/27/2022 and assigned Appeal No. 22-3118 re #14 Notice of Appeal, filed by Scott B. Sullivan. (kas) |
Filing 15 PRELIMINARY RECORD ON APPEAL transmitted to 10CCA re #14 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Packet)(kas) |
APPEAL FEE STATUS: filing fee not paid re: #14 Notice of Appeal, on behalf of Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan. Filer granted IFP status on 3/17/2022. (THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY-NO DOCUMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS TRANSACTION) (kas) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Order on Report and Recommendations,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, #12 Judgment by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan. (Sullivan, Scott) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Alter Judgment by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan (Sullivan, Scott) |
Filing 12 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 5/26/2022. (hw) |
![]() |
Filing 10 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan(Sullivan, Scott) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Scott B. Sullivan And request for additional relief by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A with Attachments)(Sullivan, Scott) Modified on 5/3/2022 to remove repeated word (ca). |
Filing 8 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan is a registered pro se participant with ECF notifications only. (gw) Modified on 5/3/2022; Mr. Sullivan also has e-filing privileges. (gw). |
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Scott B. Sullivan And request for additional relief. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ht) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT returned re #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS addressed to Scott B. Sullivan. (kas) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Scott B. Sullivan. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 4/20/2022. Mailed to pro se party Scott B. Sullivan by regular and certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7018 0680 0001 8173 8790.(kas) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(lb) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Scott B. Sullivan. (lb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Scott B. Sullivan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(lb) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.