TOOLEY v. PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC
| DENNIS TOOLEY |
| PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC |
| 1:2025cv00110 |
| January 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. (Nix, Catherine) |
Filing 12
ORDER - Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time, Dkt. #11 . As required by Local Rule 6-1, all initial extensions of a deadline for filing a response to a pleading as defined by Fed. Civ. R. Civ. P. 7(a) must first be accomplished by a Notice of Parties' First Extension of Time rather than by motion. S.D. Ind. L. R. 6-1(a). Thus, the Motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump on 2/24/2025. (BAA)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 25, 2025 to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiffs lawsuit, filed by Defendant PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order on Motion for Extension)(Nix, Catherine) |
| Filing 10 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. (Nix, Catherine) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine D. Nix on behalf of Defendant PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. (Nix, Catherine) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service, filed by DENNIS TOOLEY. PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC served on 2/7/2025. (Mussman, Louis Ivan) |
| Filing 7 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before District Judge Matthew P. Brookman. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (AAS) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. (AAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric C. Bohnet on behalf of Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Bohnet, Eric) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis Ivan Christopher Mussman on behalf of Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Mussman, Louis Ivan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC, filed by DENNIS TOOLEY. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8502169) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Mussman, Louis Ivan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TOOLEY v. PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DENNIS TOOLEY | |
| Represented By: | Louis Ivan Christopher Mussman |
| Represented By: | Eric C. Bohnet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PARDIECK DEVELOPMENT, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Catherine D. Nix |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
