Energizer Holdings, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Plaintiff: Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Case Number: 1:2022cv04508
Filed: August 24, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Filing 21 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 100,000 posted by Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Document not imaged) (nsf, )
October 4, 2022 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Any objections to the motion for a preliminary injunction must be properly filed by 10/7/22. If no objections are filed, the motion will be considered unopposed. Notices mailed. (psm, )
October 3, 2022 Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Energizer Holdings, Inc. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Service)(Vogt, Keith)
October 3, 2022 Filing 18 MEMORANDUM by Energizer Holdings, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction #17 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Keith Vogt)(Vogt, Keith)
October 3, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION by Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. for preliminary injunction (Vogt, Keith)
September 27, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (dxb, )
September 26, 2022 Filing 16 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/26/2022. Notices mailed. (psm, )
September 26, 2022 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's ex parte motion to seal, motion for excess pages, and motion for a temporary restraining order, asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process #8 #9 10 are granted. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. A $100,000 bond is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Notices mailed. (psm, )
August 31, 2022 Filing 14 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Vogt, Keith)
August 25, 2022 Filing 13 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (nsf, )
August 24, 2022 Filing 12 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Andrea J. Mealey regarding memorandum in support of motion, #11 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, Part 1, #2 Exhibit 2, Part 2, #3 Exhibit 2, Part 3, #4 Exhibit 2, Part 4, #5 Exhibit 2, Part 5)(Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM In Support of 10 Ex Parte Motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-4, Declaration of Keith Vogt, #3 Declaration of Andrea J. Mealey, #4 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Andrea J. Mealey)(Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal (Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling)
August 24, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam)
August 24, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi)
August 24, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. Schedule A to Complaint #1 (Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Energizer Holdings, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19773689. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith)
August 24, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jb, )
August 24, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Energizer Holdings, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Adam Grodman
Represented By: Yanling Jiang
Represented By: Yi Bu
Represented By: Keith A. Vogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?