Camacho v. Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai et al
| Mike Camacho |
| Gordon Brownlow, Stephen Stout, Gregory Fults, James Dobney, Richard Novak, John Sears, Denise Anderson, Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai, Deborah McKane, Associations, Inc. doing business as Associa Hawaii and Peter Thompson |
| 1:2024cv00372 |
| August 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| MICAH WJ SMITH |
| ROM TRADER |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 EO: On 8/29/2024, pro se Plaintiff Mike Camacho ("Plaintiff") initiated this action by filing his [ECF #1 ] Complaint. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 10/28/2024. The docket fails to reflect service on any of the eleven defendants. Moreover, to date, no defendant has appeared, answered or filed a responsive pleading. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, service must occur within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Absent a showing of good cause, failure to timely serve defendants may result in sanctions to include possible dismissal of this action. Recently, mail transmitted by the Court to Plaintiff's address of record has been "returned as undeliverable." ECF Nos. 18 & 19. Pro se litigants whose mailing address changes while appearing in any pending case "must file with the Court and serve upon all other parties... a Notice of Change of Address within fourteen (14) days that specifies the effective date of the change." Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii ("Local Rules" or "LR") 83.1(e)(1) (emphasis added). Failure to comply with this may result in sanctions, including dismissal when a document sent to the pro se litigant by the Court is returned to the court as undeliverable and the Court fails to receive, within thirty (30) days of the returned document, a written communication indicating a current address for service. LR83.1(e)(2). In this case, Plaintiff has failed to file a Notice of Change of Address. Nor has he filed a document that clearly communicates a different address for service. "Pro se litigants shall abide by all local, federal, and other applicable rules and/or statutes." LR81.1(a). "Sanctions, including but not limited to . . . dismissal with prejudice, may be imposed for failure to comply with the Local Rules." Id. In light of the foregoing, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference scheduled for 10/28/2024 is CONTINUED to 12/17/2024 at 8:45 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Trader. Scheduling Conference Statements are due 12/10/2024. Parties and other participants must call-in at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the conference. Call-in instructions are below:Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864 (toll-free).Meeting ID: 161 5641 6035. As Plaintiff previously has been granted permission to participate in electronic filing, he is responsible for monitoring the docket and will be deemed to receive notice electronically. ECF No. 17. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(rt2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF) |
| Filing 19 Mail returned as Undeliverable re #1 Complaint, #2 Filing Fee Received, #3 Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, #4 Application for Permission to E-file, #5 Civil Waiver of Service Packet, #6 - #16 Summons Issued, sent to Mark Camacho, 13395 Voyage Parkway, Suite 130 PMB: 311, Colorado Springs, El Paso, CO 80921 returned by USPS - Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward. The returned documents were served electronically to Mike Camacho at [email protected] on 10/8/2024. (jni) |
| Filing 18 Mail returned as Undeliverable re 17 Entering Order. Mail sent to Mike Camacho at 13395 Voyager Parkway Suite 130, PMB: 311, Colorado Springs, CO 80921 returned undelivered (not deliverable as addressed). The Entering Order was served electronically to Mike Camacho at [email protected] on August 30, 2024. (eta) |
| Filing 17 EO: On 8/29/2024, Plaintiff Mike Camacho, proceeding pro se, filed an [ECF #4 ] Application for Permission to Participate in Electronic Filing ("Application"). Plaintiff's Application is APPROVED. Plaintiff is reminded that Plaintiff is required to "abide by all local, federal, and other applicable rules and/or statutes." LR81.1(a). Any misuse or abuse of e-filing privileges may result in the revocation or termination of permission to participate in electronic filing in this case. Further, failure to abide by the Local Rules may result in sanctions, including but not limited to entry of default judgment. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(rt2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF) |
| Filing 16 Summons Issued as to Richard Novak. (jni) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Deborah McKane. (jni) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Gordon Brownlow. (jni) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Gregory Fults. (jni) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Denise Anderson.(jni) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Peter Thompson. (jni) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to James Dobney. (jni) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Stephen Stout. (jni) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to John Sears. (jni) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Associations, Inc. (jni) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai. (jni) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Permission to Participate in Electronic Filing - by Mike Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jni) |
Filing 3
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 10/28/2024 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 8/29/2024. COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF) on 8/29/2024. Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF). (jni)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee received: $ 405.00, Receipt number 3989 re #1 Complaint. (jni) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Civil Case; Jury Trial Requested against Association of Apartment Owners of Ke Nani Kai, Associations, Inc., John Sears, Stephen Stout, James Dobney, Peter Thompson, Denise Anderson, Gregory Fults, Gordon Brownlow, Deborah McKane, Richard Novak - filed by Mike Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
