Washington D.C. Seattle City et al v. Bank of Guam Santa Cruz Branch et al
Manufacturing Inc., Washington D.C. Seattle City, Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz and Washington D.C., Seattle City Manufacturing Inc. |
Bank Pacific, First Hawaiian Bank, Bank Of Guam and Bank Of Hawaii |
1:2018cv00038 |
October 15, 2018 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Guam |
Joaquin VE Manibusan |
Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Certificate of Service by Bank Of Hawaii. (Diaz, Geraldine) |
Filing 7 Third Amended Complaint against All Defendants., filed by All Plaintiffs.(fad, ) |
Filing 6 Second Amended Complaint against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (vtk) |
Filing 5 First Amended Complaint against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (vtk) |
Filing 4 Amended Complaint against All Defendants., filed by Washington D.C. Seattle City, Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz, Manufacturing Inc..(fad, ) |
Filing 3 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit filed by All Plaintiffs. (fad, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs.(fad, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.