De La Torre Pardo v. PHOENIX OF HOMESTEAD LLC
Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo |
PHOENIX OF HOMESTEAD LLC and BURGER KING RESTAURANT |
1:2025cv22120 |
May 8, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Cecilia M Altonaga |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Miami-Dade (Office - Miami) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (ksr) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PHOENIX OF HOMESTEAD LLC. (ksr) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ksr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PHOENIX OF HOMESTEAD LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18431686, filed by Nigel Frank De La Torre Pardo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.