INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION et al
| INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK |
| CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES |
| 1:2025cv01323 |
| April 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge James E. Boasberg. (znmw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Ann Brehm on behalf of INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK (Brehm, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK (Perkins, Alycia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11657201) filed by INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons to CDC, #5 Summons to HHS, #6 Summons to USAG, #7 Summons to USAO)(Perkins, Alycia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
